• Strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in view::load() (line 879 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/views.module).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_boolean_operator::value_validate() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::value_validate($form, &$form_state) in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).
  • Strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in views_include_handler() (line 77 of /mnt/stor8-wc2-dfw1/437757/drupal.halunenlaw.net/web/content/sites/all/modules/views/includes/handlers.inc).

Case Update November 2013

A proposed class action settlement has been reached between CertainTeed Corporation and representatives of owners of buildings on which the Siding had been installed. The settlement is intended to resolve disputes between the parties about the performance of the Siding. This proposed class action settlement covers the entire United States. Although the Court has not yet decided whether to approve this settlement, CertainTeed has agreed to pay $103.9 million to settle the class action.

Case Update 07/08/13

On March 8, 2013, Certainteed Corporation filed an answer to Plaintiff's class action complaint that included affirmative defenses. We are currently awaiting a Scheduling Conference to set forth a timeline for discovery and dispositive motinos. No additional action has been taken. 


More Sources for News and Case Updates

Halunen & Associates is pleased to announce that we are now on Facebook and Twitter! We will be posting CertainTeed Weatherboard case updates on both social media platforms, along with the CertainTeed Weatherboard litigation website. We will also be posting other interesting news regarding employment and consumer issues and new investigations. Find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/HalunenLaw and follow us on Twitter @Halunenlaw or https://twitter.com/#!/HalunenLaw.

Minnesota Plaintiff Files Complaint Against CertainTeed

Minnesota resident Monique Orieux has filed a class action lawsuit against CertainTeed Corporation alleging that the company's WeatherBoards fibercement siding is defectivly designed. The lawsuit alleges that the defective design causes the WeatherBoards siding to crack, warp, discolor, shrink, and in some cases fall off the building. Ms. Orieux is seeking monetary compensation, on behalf of herself and others in a similar situation, to replace her defective siding as well as a court order requiring CertainTeed to honor its warranty obligations.

Syndicate content